SportsMonkie.com
Baseball

MLB Proposes Letting Top Seeds Choose Their Playoff Opponents, and Fans Are Not Buying It

By SportsMonkie Baseball Desk Updated October 9, 2026
A hand moving a blank generic team nameplate between slots on a large baseball playoff bracket board in a stadium media room, editorial graphic
Share this guide
On this page6
  1. 01How would the selection work?
  2. 02What else is in the package?
  3. 03Why is the backlash about the Dodgers?
  4. 04What is the case against picking, beyond fairness?
  5. 05Will it actually happen?
  6. 06What happens next?

Major League Baseball wants its best teams to pick their own postseason opponents. The league tabled the idea in a bargaining session with the players’ union on Thursday, Reuters reports: from 2027, higher seeds in the Wild Card and Division Series rounds would select who they play, rather than taking the opponent the bracket assigns them. It is the rare labour proposal that fans understood instantly, and the reaction, led by the suspicion that the Dodgers hardly need the help, has been fierce.

How would the selection work?

In both early rounds, and always in the higher seed’s favour. In the Wild Card Series, the No. 3 seed would choose between the No. 5 and No. 6 seeds, and the No. 4 seed would take whichever team is left, Men’s Journal reports. Then, in the Division Series, the No. 1 seed would choose which of the two Wild Card winners it wants, with the No. 2 seed receiving the other. The league’s fact sheet, reported by the New York Post, sells the pick as a way to avoid a stronger opponent, to make the regular-season record matter more, and to generate engagement and rivalries. Read that last part plainly: the selection is meant to be content, a decision made on television that the chosen team then gets to resent in public.

What else is in the package?

The structural changes the selection would sit inside. The regular season would shrink from 162 games to 154 from 2029, creating a standard weekly off day that the league says is for player health, Reuters reports. The Division Series, currently best-of-five, the format that just produced Jackson Chourio’s final-strike walk-off for Milwaukee, would become best-of-seven, with extra off days in October and fewer weekday afternoon games. Opponent selection is the one piece that would arrive early, in 2027, presumably because it costs the league nothing to schedule and everything it touches turns into a broadcast.

Why is the backlash about the Dodgers?

Because they are the team the bracket already seems to bend toward. The New York Post reports that much of the fan anger focuses on the two-time defending champions being handed an easier path by design. Los Angeles is also the team whose current run keeps generating the postseason’s strangest weeks, from an elimination game a pitcher missed for the birth of his child to Tarik Skubal’s beer-soaked celebration interview. The objection is not really about competitive balance in one series. It is about a league proposing, mid-dynasty, to let the dynasty choose.

What is the case against picking, beyond fairness?

The backfire. For The Win’s coverage of the reaction keeps returning to the same joke, which is also a genuine strategic problem: the team you pick has just been told, on the record, that you think it is the weakest option available. In a sport where a single fan reaching over a fence can flip a series on one judgement call, handing your opponent a grievance before Game 1 is a real cost. Managers already refuse to answer which opponent they would prefer. This proposal would make the answer official, televised and permanent, and a top seed swept by its own selection would own the most embarrassing exit in the sport’s history.

Will it actually happen?

That depends on a fight that has nothing to do with brackets. The MLBPA says it is reviewing the proposals and will respond at the bargaining table, Reuters reports, but its statement adds the sentence that decides everything: the league has made clear all of its proposals are contingent on the players agreeing to a salary cap, which the union describes as a system that guts player rights and compensation. So the most entertaining idea in the package is chained to the one idea the players have promised never to accept.

What happens next?

The union answers at the table, and the cap question swallows the schedule question, as it was always going to. If the sides ever separate the formats from the cap, opponent selection is the piece with genuine television value and a 2027 start date already attached. Until then, the bracket stays honest by default, and the only choosing happening this October is the kind Ronald Acuna Jr. had to do this week: deciding which story about you is true.

Share this article

Frequently asked questions

How would choosing playoff opponents actually work?+

In two rounds. In the Wild Card round, the No. 3 seed, the division winner with the worst record, would choose to play either the No. 5 or the No. 6 seed, with the No. 4 seed taking the team left over, Men's Journal reports. In the Division Series, the No. 1 seed would choose which of the two Wild Card winners it wants to face, and the No. 2 seed would get the other.

When would opponent selection start?+

2027, a year from now, according to the league's own announcement of the proposal. That is two years before the rest of the package: the 154-game schedule and the standard weekly off day are proposed to begin in 2029, while the best-of-seven Division Series is part of the same structural overhaul.

What else is in the proposal?+

A regular season cut from 162 games to 154 from 2029, creating a standard weekly off day the league says benefits player health, Reuters reports. The Division Series would grow from best-of-five to best-of-seven, with extra postseason off days designed to reduce weekday daytime games and put more games in prime time.

Why does the league want teams picking opponents?+

Its own fact sheet, reported by the New York Post, gives three reasons: a top seed could avoid a stronger opponent, the regular-season record would matter more, and the selection itself would generate fan engagement and stoke rivalries. In other words, the league wants the pick to be a televised moment, not just a bracket outcome.

What did the players' union say?+

That it is reviewing the proposals and will respond at the bargaining table, and that the league has again made clear every proposal is contingent on the players agreeing to a salary cap, Reuters reports. The union's statement calls a cap a system that guts player rights and compensation, which makes the fun parts of the package hostages to the part the players have sworn to reject.

Why are fans against it?+

Two reasons dominate the reaction reported by the New York Post and For The Win. The first is fairness: the two-time defending champion Dodgers are the team fans picture using a pick to take the easiest possible path. The second is the backfire risk: a team that is publicly chosen as the easy opponent gets the best bulletin-board material in sports, and a top seed swept by the team it picked would never hear the end of it.

Has any major league done this before?+

Not at this level. DodgerBlue describes the plan as a first for professional sports: no MLB, NFL, NBA or NHL postseason has ever let a higher seed name its own opponent. Reseeding, where the best remaining team automatically draws the weakest, is the closest any of them has come, and even that is a rule, not a choice.

Sources

Play & tools

Free browser games and tools — no account, no download.

Related baseball guides

View all →