Suriname Call on FIFA and Concacaf to Act After Racist Abuse Allegation in Guatemala

Suriname’s players finished a match they considered walking out of, lost it in stoppage time, and then asked football’s governing bodies a direct question: how many times does this have to happen? The team has called on FIFA and Concacaf to investigate alleged racist abuse from the crowd during Monday’s Nations League match in Guatemala City, USA Today reports. The player who reacted to the alleged abuse was the one sent off.

What happened in the 63rd minute?

The match turned on a red card. Suriname forward Richonell Margaret was shown a direct red card for what appeared to be a comment made toward a fan, USA Today reports, and The Sun reports the dismissal set the benches against each other as tempers rose.

Margaret said afterwards that the crowd had been making monkey noises at him, USA Today reports, and he shared racist comments and images sent to him on Instagram, asking the governing bodies whether players always have to accept this. His manager Henk Fraser gave the fullest account of the flashpoint: the red card came because a player reacted to noises from the crowd, noises Fraser called stupid and ignorant, while also saying Margaret should have responded better and that the dismissal cost Suriname the game, USA Today reports.

Why did the game stop for nearly 10 minutes?

Because the anti-racism protocol started. Play was held up for nearly 10 minutes while Suriname spoke with referee Joe Dickerson, who could be seen making the crossed-arms “X” gesture, FIFA’s signal for reported racist abuse, during his conversation with captain Myenty Abena, USA Today reports.

Abena then gathered his team in front of the bench and the players made the decision themselves: continue with 10 men, or walk off and accept the consequences. They continued. Abena wrote afterwards that the choice was made with about 20 minutes left, out of love for the game and each other, and he was explicit that finishing the match did not mean forgiving what prompted the stoppage. A red card that punishes the reaction while the alleged provocation goes unexamined is the imbalance Suriname keep returning to.

What happened at the end of the match?

The result, and then a brawl. Guatemala won 1-0 through Matthew Evans in the sixth minute of stoppage time against the 10 men, The Sun reports, a goal that put Guatemala into the Nations League quarter-finals as Group B winners, against Canada next month, and eliminated Suriname, who finished third and fall into the Gold Cup preliminary round.

At the final whistle the two teams fought in the middle of the pitch, with players and substitutes exchanging blows until riot police came in to separate them, The Sun reports. It was the second disciplinary spectacle of this international window, after Ireland’s draw with Israel ended in a spitting allegation that UEFA is now investigating, and it guarantees Concacaf has more than the racism complaint to review from this fixture.

Why do Suriname say this is a pattern, not an incident?

Because it happened to them last year, in the same region, and the system already agreed with them once. Suriname endured racist chanting during a World Cup qualifier in El Salvador in 2025; FIFA fined the Salvadoran federation and ordered part of the stadium closed for the next home game, USA Today reports.

General manager Brian Tevreden stood on the touchline at both matches. In a statement to USA Today he called Monday scandalous, said Suriname are the ones being punished while their match was turned upside down, and said he is seriously considering no longer travelling with the team to places where this is allowed to happen. Several Guatemala players apologised to Fraser for the crowd’s behaviour, USA Today reports, a detail that complicates any attempt to dismiss the allegation as sour grapes after a defeat. Disciplinary arguments over red cards are nothing new in this region’s football, as Jesse Marsch’s attack on the Balogun red-card ruling showed this week, but Suriname’s complaint is about what the crowd did, not what the referee decided.

What are Suriname asking FIFA and Concacaf to do?

Investigate, and then act. Abena’s post-match message called on both bodies to take responsibility, arguing that players had done their part by finishing the game in extremely difficult circumstances and were now waiting for the governing bodies to do theirs, USA Today reports. His line that words and campaigns are not enough is aimed at a specific record: the previous incident produced a fine and a partial stadium closure, and the abuse, on Suriname’s account, happened again a year later in another country.

Neither FIFA nor Concacaf had responded when USA Today sought comment. What to watch is whether Concacaf opens a disciplinary case covering all three threads of the night, the alleged abuse, Margaret’s red card and the full-time brawl, and whether any sanction goes further than the one El Salvador received. Suriname have now been through this twice. Their captain’s question, whether players must always accept it, is sitting in two inboxes.